What are Reviewer metrics? Finding the right Reviewer metrics can be daunting, especially when you're busy working on your day-to-day tasks. This is why we've curated a list of examples for your inspiration.
Copy these examples into your preferred tool, or adopt Tability to ensure you remain accountable.
Find Reviewer metrics with AI While we have some examples available, it's likely that you'll have specific scenarios that aren't covered here. You can use our free AI metrics generator below to generate your own strategies.
Examples of Reviewer metrics and KPIs 1. Impact Factor Measures the average number of citations received in a year by articles published in the journal during the previous two years
What good looks like for this metric: Typical values range from 0 to 10 depending on the field
Ideas to improve this metric Increase the quality and relevance of published articles Encourage authors to cite published works in future papers Collaborate with renowned researchers to publish high-impact papers Promote journal content through academic conferences Optimise search engine visibility of journal articles 2. Citations Per Article Average number of citations received per article published in the journal
What good looks like for this metric: Averages vary significantly by discipline, commonly above 5 for high-impact journals
Ideas to improve this metric Encourage authors to engage in citation networks Promote open access to increase visibility and citability Publish review articles that tend to accumulate more citations Increase engagement with social media channels Facilitate easy access and sharing of articles 3. Submission to Publication Time Average time taken from the submission of a manuscript to its publication in the journal
What good looks like for this metric: 3-6 months is typical for many journals
Ideas to improve this metric Streamline the peer-review process Implement digital tools to manage manuscripts efficiently Ensure clarity in submission guidelines to reduce revisions Communicate regularly with authors and reviewers Offer expedited review process options for a fee 4. Acceptance Rate Percentage of submitted manuscripts accepted for publication
What good looks like for this metric: Ranges from 5% to 25% depending on journal selectivity
Ideas to improve this metric Establish clear publication standards Provide constructive feedback to authors for improvement Ensure rigorous peer-review process Maintain transparency in rejection criteria Adjust submission requirements to attract high-quality manuscripts 5. Journal Reach and Readership Measures the size and engagement level of the journal's audience, including geographic reach and reader demographics
What good looks like for this metric: 2000 to 5000 monthly visitors for established journals
Ideas to improve this metric Enhance outreach efforts through academic networks Develop partnerships with universities and research institutions Utilise email newsletters to engage and grow subscriber base Optimise journal content with SEO techniques Leverage analytics to understand and target audience interests
← →
1. Review Cycle Time The average time taken from the initiation of a review process to its completion
What good looks like for this metric: 2-4 weeks
Ideas to improve this metric Streamline the review process steps Implement deadlines for each review stage Utilise automated tools for routine tasks Provide training for faster review Conduct regular process audits 2. Review Quality Score A quality score assigned to reviews based on predefined criteria and feedback
What good looks like for this metric: 80-90%
Ideas to improve this metric Enhance reviewer training programmes Develop a detailed review checklist Incorporate peer feedback into reviews Regularly update review criteria Reward high-quality reviews 3. Review Completion Rate The percentage of reviews completed out of all initiated reviews
What good looks like for this metric: 90%+
Ideas to improve this metric Set clear roles and responsibilities Implement a tracking system for reviews Ensure adequate resourcing for review tasks Address common delay points in the process Regularly review incomplete review reasons 4. Reviewer Utilisation Rate The percentage of time reviewers spend on review activities out of their total available work time
What good looks like for this metric: 60-80%
Ideas to improve this metric Balance reviewer workloads effectively Provide additional resources during peak times Cross-train staff to assist with reviews Automate or delegate non-essential reviewer tasks Set priorities for review assignments 5. Review Feedback Loop The percentage of reviews followed by actionable feedback and subsequent improvements
What good looks like for this metric: 70%+
Ideas to improve this metric Establish a clear feedback protocol Encourage open and honest feedback Implement a follow-up mechanism for feedback actions Regularly review the effectiveness of feedback Foster a culture of continuous improvement
← →
Tracking your Reviewer metrics Having a plan is one thing, sticking to it is another.
Setting good strategies is only the first challenge. The hard part is to avoid distractions and make sure that you commit to the plan. A simple weekly ritual will greatly increase the chances of success.
A tool like Tability can also help you by combining AI and goal-setting to keep you on track.
More metrics recently published We have more examples to help you below.
Planning resources OKRs are a great way to translate strategies into measurable goals. Here are a list of resources to help you adopt the OKR framework:
Tability's check-ins will save you hours and increase transparency
The best metrics for Compliance and Improvement