What are Performance Assessment metrics? Developing an effective Performance Assessment metrics can be intimidating, especially when your daily duties demand your attention. To assist you, we've curated a list of examples to inspire your planning process.
Feel free to copy these examples into your favorite application, or leverage Tability to maintain accountability.
Find Performance Assessment metrics with AI While we have some examples available, it's likely that you'll have specific scenarios that aren't covered here. You can use our free AI metrics generator below to generate your own strategies.
Examples of Performance Assessment metrics and KPIs 1. Defect Density Defect density measures the number of defects confirmed in the software during a specific period of development divided by the size of the software.
What good looks like for this metric: Less than 1 defect per 1,000 lines of code
Ideas to improve this metric Implement peer code reviews Conduct regular testing phases Adopt test-driven development Use static code analysis tools Enhance developer training programmes 2. Code Coverage Code coverage is the percentage of your code which is tested by automated tests.
What good looks like for this metric: 80% - 90%
Ideas to improve this metric Review untested code sections Invest in automated testing tools Aim for high test case quality Integrate continuous integration practices Regularly refactor and simplify code 3. Cycle Time Cycle time measures the time from when work begins on a feature until it's released to production.
What good looks like for this metric: 1 - 5 days
Ideas to improve this metric Streamline build processes Improve collaboration tools Enhance team communication rituals Limit work in progress (WIP) Automate repetitive tasks 4. Technical Debt Technical debt represents the implied cost of future rework caused by choosing an easy solution now instead of a better approach.
What good looks like for this metric: Under 5% of total project cost
Ideas to improve this metric Regularly refactor existing code Set priority levels for debt reduction Maintain comprehensive documentation Conduct technical debt assessments Encourage practices to avoid accumulating debt 5. Customer Satisfaction Customer satisfaction measures the level of contentment clients feel with the software, often gauged through surveys.
What good looks like for this metric: Above 80% satisfaction rate
Ideas to improve this metric Gather feedback through surveys Implement a user-centric design approach Enhance customer support services Ensure frequent updates and improvements Analyse and respond to customer complaints
← →
1. Referral Submission Rate Percentage of referred students for special education services compared to total student population
What good looks like for this metric: Typically 5-10% of student population
Ideas to improve this metric Educate staff on referral process Streamline referral documentation Enhance communication with parents Regularly analyse referral data Offer professional development 2. Evaluation Timeliness Percentage of evaluations completed within the 60-day timeframe
What good looks like for this metric: 90% completion within 60 days
Ideas to improve this metric Implement a strict timeline for evaluations Coordinate efficiently with multidisciplinary team Conduct regular evaluations of compliance rates Communicate deadlines with all stakeholders Automate reminder systems for deadlines 3. Eligibility Determination Rate Percentage of evaluated students who are determined eligible for special education services
What good looks like for this metric: Approximately 80-85% eligibility post-evaluation
Ideas to improve this metric Ensure comprehensive evaluations Provide clear eligibility criteria Regular training for assessment team Review non-eligible cases for gaps Strengthen collaboration with parents and educators 4. IEP Implementation Rate Percentage of IEP plans that are fully implemented as planned
What good looks like for this metric: 95% full implementation
Ideas to improve this metric Ensure clear communication among IEP team members Regularly monitor IEP implementation progress Provide adequate resources and training Conduct frequent IEP team meetings Implement a feedback system for identification of barriers 5. Adequate Progress Rate Percentage of students demonstrating adequate progress towards IEP goals
What good looks like for this metric: 70% of students meeting or exceeding IEP goals
Ideas to improve this metric Use data-driven decision making Enhance instructional strategies Regularly update IEP goals Provide targeted interventions Perform frequent progress reviews
← →
Tracking your Performance Assessment metrics Having a plan is one thing, sticking to it is another.
Don't fall into the set-and-forget trap. It is important to adopt a weekly check-in process to keep your strategy agile – otherwise this is nothing more than a reporting exercise.
A tool like Tability can also help you by combining AI and goal-setting to keep you on track.
More metrics recently published We have more examples to help you below.
Planning resources OKRs are a great way to translate strategies into measurable goals. Here are a list of resources to help you adopt the OKR framework: